Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:53:14 -0500
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To:        dirkx@covalent.net
Cc:        krentel@dreamscape.com, peter@wemm.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: dump on mounted fs
Message-ID:  <20020723145314.GE82383@dan.emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.44.0207211838370.315-100000@mobile.webweaving.org>
References:  <200207190139.g6J1da517312@dreamscape.com> <Pine.OSX.4.44.0207211838370.315-100000@mobile.webweaving.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jul 21), dirkx@covalent.net said:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Mark W. Krentel wrote:
> > > Dump on a live FS is always risky.  FreeBSD in 4.x and earlier
> > > will have up to about a 30 second delay before a write() makes it
> > > to physical disk.
> 
> Is this regardless of the sync(8) command used ? And if so - what
> does sync(8) actually sync - and which things are taking longer to
> sync ?

On a softupdates-mounted filesytem, all sync does is speed up the
block-flushing clock a bit, I believe.  It doesn't guarantee that
unwritten data is flushed before the call returns.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020723145314.GE82383>