Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:19:35 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r210409 - in head/sys: conf crypto/aesni modules modules/aesni Message-ID: <20100723141935.GC88880@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100723140932.GU2381@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <201007231100.o6NB0kcK069153@svn.freebsd.org> <20100723140744.GA88880@FreeBSD.org> <20100723140932.GU2381@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:09:32PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 02:07:44PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:00:46AM +0000, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Author: kib > > > Date: Fri Jul 23 11:00:46 2010 > > > New Revision: 210409 > > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/210409 > > > > > > Log: > > > Crypto(4) driver for AESNI. > > > > > > The aeskeys_{amd64,i386}.S content was mostly obtained from OpenBSD, > > > no objections to the license from core. > > > > If code was mostly obtained from OpenBSD, why license does not credit > > it? > > Should it ? OpenBSD took Intel code. There is no OpenBSD copyright on the > files in the OpenBSD repo. > > The files already have enough sad history behind them. OK, I trust your judgment here. It just was not obvious from the commit message. Sorry I did not look at OpenBSD original files. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100723141935.GC88880>