From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May  1 14:29:07 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA20754
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 May 1996 14:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA20728
          Wed, 1 May 1996 14:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id XAA09988; Wed, 1 May 1996 23:13:06 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199605012113.XAA09988@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: lmbench IDE anomaly
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 23:13:05 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, koshy@india.hp.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199605011921.MAA10011@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at May 1, 96 12:21:25 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Anyway, the results showing SCSI being better than IDE are certainly
> valid.

So we are back to the regular "SCSI is better than IDE" debate...

	Luigi
====================================================================
Luigi Rizzo                     Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione
email: luigi@iet.unipi.it       Universita' di Pisa
tel: +39-50-568533              via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy)
fax: +39-50-568522              http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/
====================================================================