From owner-cvs-all Sat Jul 14 21:48:22 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB6A37B40F; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 21:48:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from wonky.feral.com (wonky.feral.com [192.67.166.7]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6F4mAS95097; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 21:48:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 21:47:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: To: John Baldwin Cc: , , Matt Jacob Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha machdep.c mp_machdep.c vm_ma In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20010714214700.F29989-100000@wonky.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 15-Jul-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > What do you mean? You mean the 'cngect' dance? That'd work too if you'd like. > > No, the ugly rendezvous where we stop all the CPUs and then do a handshake to > transfer control over to the boot CPU which then shuts down the CPU that just > poked it and then performs the final halt so that the SRM console is on the > boot CPU, for example. Alpha may not need this however. The 4100 at work > doesn't hang on shutdowns and seems to work fine regardless of which CPU does > the halt and drop to SRM. My 4100 hung. There was no rendevous in alpha, nor were any processors stopped. They are now, although it could be done with a handshake. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message