From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 04:40:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5BB16A47B for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:40:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from huangxiangkui@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCF643D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:40:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from huangxiangkui@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c31so364183nfb for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:40:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i+hnKIFnyYqjzcmGflHKvOZCLSXFuk+Dqqa3K3nSvpElLsJ6TW+MsYKWcnKCs4zwAsYB0y8Nj76sDKdF2xcfHNtsQLIxeZyiHYXxiTy+jEkq2WSe3dX1Jtka4KwCjDuCXlZ+HE6wOs5Duy4VPjBpsJhDFg3mJDfGysenPyBYSe0= Received: by 10.49.33.14 with SMTP id l14mr631903nfj; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.203.20 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:40:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:40:07 +0800 From: huangxiangkui@gmail.com To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E04650068@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E04650068@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: How can I fix these problems of the asl of my computer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:40:10 -0000 But HOW can I use the newer ACPI in the FreeBSD 6.0 release-p4? And I don't find the 20060217 in the web of Inter. http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm Where can I download the compiler? How CAN I use new ACPI?Should I make the kernel? Can I fix the error by use the new ACPI? 2006/2/18, Moore, Robert : > 17 February 2006. Summary of changes for version 20060217: > > 2) iASL Compiler/Disassembler: > > Implemented support for new reserved names: _WDG and _WED are Microsoft > extensions for Windows Instrumentation Management, _TDL is a new > ACPI-defined method (Throttling Depth Limit.) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jung-uk Kim [mailto:jkim@FreeBSD.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:20 PM > > To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org > > Cc: Moore, Robert; huangxiangkui@gmail.com > > Subject: Re: How can I fix these problems of the asl of my computer? > > > > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 06:06 pm, Moore, Robert wrote: > > > I had a sneaking suspicion that MS might be involved in this. > > > > :-) > > > > > I can add these to the compiler's reserved list to eliminate future > > > warnings. > > > > Great. > > > > > BTW, I meant that most everyone goes nearly blind attempting to > > > read the ACPI spec. > > > > Yes, I think I am going to be the next victim. ;-) > > > > Jung-uk Kim > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Jung-uk Kim [mailto:jkim@FreeBSD.org] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 2:58 PM > > > > To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org > > > > Cc: Moore, Robert; huangxiangkui@gmail.com > > > > Subject: Re: How can I fix these problems of the asl of my > > > > computer? > > > > > > > > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 05:39 pm, Moore, Robert wrote: > > > > > ze2205au.asl 4138: Name (_WDG, Buffer (0x50) > > > > > Warning 2033 - Unknown reserved name ^ (_WDG) > > > > > > > > > > ze2205au.asl 4699: Method (_WED, 1, NotSerialized) > > > > > Warning 2033 - Unknown reserved name ^ (_WED) > > > > > > > > This is a very common problem with all recent HP/Compaq laptops: > > > > http://gentoo-wiki.com/Talk:HOWTO_Fix_Common_ACPI_Problems > > > > > > > > > 2) Ignore the warnings. Your BIOS writers did not read the ACPI > > > > > spec or became blind sometime in the middle of it, highly > > > > > probable. > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > No, they are not blind. They just work for the dark side. ;-) > > > > > > > > Both _WDG and _WED are Microsoft extensions: > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppwr/wmi/wmi-acpi.mspx > > > > > > > > Jung-uk Kim >