From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 06:40:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DC794A; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com (mail-pb0-f49.google.com [209.85.160.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C315F42; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id un15so2675140pbc.36 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:40:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=vs/RKBQ8PC4UY4TjTAzY1G5HhVJwKzAMFdC1a962ox4=; b=n1WRjtgpPRLkPp24Zv0pAyPpamlwESKxMiIabsLUjoZV7uxZCjSqNbPKha7Hy/E4Oq MUVZpEizXZv4FfQ/e2owEGJ3bcCSkfDIWzX1SG+XxNOPy5qEcJE/xH0niPATnA/X0ZnD KOuyf9BpHsm58GApcWLuYgcOmn+5IqLuSy/z5MJ/WwCd3vO1pXgpwTlh/CoWacMYtz+Y q5tlxmPLtsXGdxuDJWS5MNuTWjcMHgWyjsiHB7Ntn9CS4nmp3xqBhWPAw8vjixA7swpo 1Q0uFGSMitXJkrsAFRKiKqhSxN372qhMG1tKBHQAaaxxeqKy/unBlZbz+KBdyhn9Htax akIw== X-Received: by 10.68.137.234 with SMTP id ql10mr260704534pbb.158.1358232017274; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:40:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com (lpe4.p59-icn.cdngp.net. [114.111.62.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5sm10260300pay.5.2013.01.14.22.40.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:40:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:40:11 +0900 From: YongHyeon PYUN Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:40:11 +0900 To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov Subject: Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX Message-ID: <20130115064011.GA1434@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <50F110AB.1030107@yandex.ru> <50F14880.4090001@yandex.ru> <50F177E9.3040003@yandex.ru> <20130114061553.GA3531@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <50F3F172.5060903@yandex.ru> <20130115024430.GA3152@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <50F4F7E6.7070004@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50F4F7E6.7070004@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:40:23 -0000 On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44: > >On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15: > >>>On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>>>Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an > >>>>patch attached, but whenever kldloading the modified if_vr, I got this: > >> > >>[...] > >> > >>>>I also tried to apply VR_Q_NEEDALIGN quirk, but nothing is changed. Any > >>>>hints? > >>> > >>>I recall D-Link was one of notorious vendor which used to > >>>completely change its chip set in later revisions without notice. So > >>>I'm afraid the controller you have may not be a VIA manufactured > >>>one. > >>>Could you take a picture of the chip set of controller and let > >>>others see it? I guess it could be a RealTek 8139 or 8139C+. > >> > >>Here they are. Both front and back for the case (see no traces of > >>RealTek though): > >> > >>http://s2.postimage.org/9nvkrlpqx/IMAG1040.jpg > >>http://s2.postimage.org/4qi06hnrt/IMAG1041.jpg > > > >Thanks. Try attached patch and let me know how it works. > >If that patch does not work, try setting a loader tunable like the > >following. > >dev.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 > > Terrific! It's now attaching fine, but network over it doesn't seems > working (can't ping/access machine via this interface): Please use my patch. I think rl(4) is the right driver for your controller. Jeremie's patch forces re(4) to attach. > > re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 > options=8209b > ether 90:94:e4:82:d5:e6 > inet 192.168.0.208 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > inet6 fe80::9294:e4ff:fe82:d5e6%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > nd6 options=29 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > > re0@pci0:4:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x11031186 chip=0x42001186 > rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'D-Link System Inc' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > I also tried to add dev.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 to /boot/loader.conf with no > difference. I'll try to experiment with this later this day when there > will be no active users on this machine, then let you know the results. It's not a valid option when you use re(4). > Thank you!