From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 8 13:08:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6765FE6B633 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8EBD7A34D for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w08CuAH4068749 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:56:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: 000.fbsd@quip.cz Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w08Cu6VQ084750 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 19:56:06 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: 'pkg upgrade -f spamassassin' stops but doesn't restart spamd To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Michael Grimm , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <76627A89-D7E9-4010-910B-5F25886E7E7E@ellael.org> <5A523873.2050001@quip.cz> <5A524855.2040901@grosbein.net> <5A5284CC.9050400@quip.cz> <5A528749.9070308@grosbein.net> <5A528A87.4050908@quip.cz> <5A528D36.4020409@grosbein.net> <5A5351F0.7050804@quip.cz> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5A536A62.4030807@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 19:56:02 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A5351F0.7050804@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, LOCAL_FROM, RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:08:22 -0000 08.01.2018 18:11, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> PRs are false alibi. Some of my PRs are open for more than 10 years. >> >> So were mine when I could not commit fixes myself. This is not excuse to be lazy and not make another one. >> >>> For all erroneous port there must be will on maintainer and committer side. >>> And if "they" think this is not a bug >> >> If we have written policy (and we have in this case), and upgrade really break things, >> sane committer will not think "this is not a bug". >> >> Again, do you have a PR with "how-to-repeat" scenario and a patch, >> so I could take it? > > OK, let's move on. I can open PR if you are willing to help and commit some fixes. But can we first talk Relevant discussion should better take place in the PR itself so it's not lost and easier to point to when asking corresponding parties, f.e. portmgr@ You may open PR without patch too, you know. But it needs clear description of the problem and "how-to-repeat".