Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:49:09 +1100 From: Aristedes Maniatis <ari@ish.com.au> To: Jordi Espasa Clofent <jespasac@minibofh.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replication system Message-ID: <9335DDBE-F6DC-4433-A47D-D18266BA49CF@ish.com.au> In-Reply-To: <490F6EBF.5000102@minibofh.org> References: <490F6EBF.5000102@minibofh.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/11/2008, at 8:35 AM, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > At first approach I've thought in rsync+cron, but unison [1] works really well for us. In some ways it is better than some sort of shared SAN type solution since there is no single point of failure at the SAN or link to the SAN. Unison is just two way rsync so that changes can propagate in both directions between servers. Ari [1] http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ --------------------------> ish http://www.ish.com.au Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9335DDBE-F6DC-4433-A47D-D18266BA49CF>