From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 20:30:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DABE1065678 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228D68FC1A for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3UKU6DI068359 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m3UKU6Kw068353; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:06 GMT Message-Id: <200804302030.m3UKU6Kw068353@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Andrey Chernov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/123262: png / md5/ sha checksum failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrey Chernov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:30:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/123262; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrey Chernov To: Michael Scheidell Cc: bf , bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/123262: png / md5/ sha checksum failure Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 00:24:00 +0400 On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 03:22:05PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I've pulled the file from the SURFnet and University of Kent mirrors and > the simplesystems.org mirror referenced on the site. All have the same > 804821 bytes big file. The tar.gz also doesn't match. Sooner or later libpng author will notice this thing and fix it in one or another way. Mailing him may also help. > If you have the right and the supposedly wrong version, why not untar them > and diff them to see what the differences are? I don't think it wrong, but some beta can be leaked out instead of release. Without surely know which variant libpng author treats as ring, I don't want to change anything, especially when some mirrors match one distributive and others anoter one. -- http://ache.pp.ru/