From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Feb 1 3:54:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (fxp0.halvsten.ip.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C2B37B684 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 03:54:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f11BrXZ04162; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:53:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Tony Finch Cc: Brian Somers , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Cloned open support In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Feb 2001 11:47:47 GMT." <20010201114747.K70673@hand.dotat.at> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 12:53:33 +0100 Message-ID: <4160.981028413@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010201114747.K70673@hand.dotat.at>, Tony Finch writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >>Later when we get a devd(8) daemon knitted together it will >>get the chance to set the modes before the open completes. > >Is it possible to do non-blocking open()s? (Other than via KSEs) This doesn't really affect the blocking/non-blocking open implementation in any way. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message