From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 19 20:36:45 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6915D58;
 Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:36:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EE332A7B;
 Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:36:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p61so3545935wes.22
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:36:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=h3G8NjPQUZTP24TzVKuMC5JhRoIuOo8pTtwKdE7t+3g=;
 b=06hTKn9MkblFUaM3Uaa7Kd2DTZLzyoqtM6jm2OxZr8i3200Arpu0DVKxAa56MMC+cy
 xwa9kKC1RJ8a6Aa25RZ/bkd0mcH31kaGmJB3jfGNOD9990j5gIAAakInJLoUq9wlMXPq
 PWwoJykfyMOtJzUMnhEA8toqGqPHzHGq9emzRLV49ghWtWaW/0uq8ySxNE0eCbjQrcOk
 p41HuxRt9qSEV++e0iPigXP0Wca7+UpslKzpsn0StvO+rCvNn72THwqfKRNgTl1SHEes
 xq6ieOvESsmHF2X032pzO6c6hPX9EMb5lrEFMhqHVrsUwRXbg+Hb5e86jMBXzL6oXaNm
 GGNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.242 with SMTP id ff18mr22676243wic.44.1384893403424; 
 Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.91.144 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:36:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPS9+Sv9Um47wzOkfEsA_S7sb-FbQ=aZE2qb7EkFgnzEsrOc+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAcX-AGDZbFn5RmhLBBn2PPWRPcsFUnea5MgTc7nuXGD8Ge53A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPS9+Sv9Um47wzOkfEsA_S7sb-FbQ=aZE2qb7EkFgnzEsrOc+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:36:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAcX-AHqxnx73+P_h0ooK8CNZCM0+Oo-TckLNHexqnP8bytCpA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ipfw table add problem
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan_KIRIK?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16
Cc: freebsd-ipfw <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:36:45 -0000

Hi,



On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>wrote=
:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:55 PM, =D6zkan KIRIK <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>wro=
te:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel.
>> I am trying to add port number to ipfw tables. But there is something
>> strange :
>> Problem is easily repeatable.
>>
>> #ipfw table 1 flush
>> #ipfw table 1 add 4899
>> #ipfw table 1 list
>> ::/0 0
>>
> Works with ipfw table 1 add 0 4899
>
No, i want to use this table as port list ( to use with "lookup src-port 1"
) . If you add like this, you cannot match against ports. Am I wrong?


>
>> #ipfw table 1 flush
>> #ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01       ( not 10.0.0.1,   the last 1 has 0 as
>> prefix )
>> #ipfw table 1 list
>> ::/0 0
>>
> Did you mean ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.0 1 ? That works for me.
>
Please dont leave spaces between 0 and 1.


>
>> #ipfw table 1 delete ::/0
>> ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_TABLE_XDEL): No such process
>>
> However ipfw table 1 delete 0.0.0.0/0 does.
>
Thank you

>
>>
>> I guess that, this problem is related to radix mask calculation
>> problem/fix.
>>
>> Is there a quick solution for this.
>> Best, regards,
>
>
> Best regards
> Andreas
>

Best regards,
Ozkan.