From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 20:03:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B5716A42D for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Received: from rly3.z8.ru (counter.z8.ru [217.106.232.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D589743D46 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:03:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Received: from elm.z8.ru (elm.z8.ru [217.106.232.16]) by rly3.z8.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j84K3bV5045639 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 00:03:38 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Received: from [192.168.8.22] (41.dsl.telesto.lsi.ru [212.58.217.41] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by elm.z8.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j84K3bN8080384 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 00:03:37 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dreamer2@tikhvin.info) Message-ID: <431B5311.9090109@tikhvin.info> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:03:29 +0400 From: Vitaly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <430060FB.1000405@tikhvin.info> <4314537C.5050808@tikhvin.info> <4314A32A.9050105@errno.com> <43183E7D.50802@tikhvin.info> <4319200A.2010702@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <4319200A.2010702@errno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/1062/Sun Sep 4 11:55:30 2005 on counter.z8.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: ath bridge panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 20:03:41 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > Sorry but I do not understand "while cleint authentication in > progress". Is this an ap? Where is the configuration? What client > is this? > configuration in my first message, hostap on BETA3, and windows clients should i repost conf? > > ath is the wrong level to look for problems; look at the net80211 > level. I have a number of changes in current that have yet to be > MFC'd to RELENG_6 for ap operation so they may help you. Also I'm > aware that 11g ap operation is not right for a mixed-bss. The ap does > not announce a revised ERP information element in the beacons when > non-ERP stations join/leave the bss so a mixed station bss may not > function correctly due to inconsistent setup of preamble and/or > protection. No eta on when that'll be fixed; it's easy but my time is > limited right now. > if i set hostap card in 80211b mode it would help?