From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jul 18 9:54:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C1037B637 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:54:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA28211 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:54:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA12222; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:54:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007181654.JAA12222@vashon.polstra.com> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: final call: truncate into the base system or not? In-Reply-To: <20000716225543.A7308@cichlids.cichlids.com> References: <20000716225543.A7308@cichlids.cichlids.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <20000716225543.A7308@cichlids.cichlids.com>, Alexander Langer wrote: > > Since I can't recall any consensus whether importing or not, but only > about implementation details, I'd like to know, what the opinion of > _importing_ it into the base system is, _beside_ all implementation > details. Yes, please just do it. We don't need another 1 MB of discussion to bring in 9 KB of sources. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message