From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Mar 23 14:26:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CF6ADA06C; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007831C25; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id F31E2185B; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:26:04 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r411713 - head/x11-toolkits/fox16 Message-ID: <20160323142604.GB64753@FreeBSD.org> References: <201603231406.u2NE6b7R075229@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201603231406.u2NE6b7R075229@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:26:05 -0000 On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:06:37PM +0000, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > New Revision: 411713 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/411713 > > Log: > Update to 1.6.51. > > PR: 208215 > Submitted by: tkato432 yahoo com > Sponsored by: Absolight > > Modified: head/x11-toolkits/fox16/pkg-descr > [...] > @@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ a program once, and compile anywhere (or > like Java to me). FOX is a very flexible library, it has all sorts of > functions and options, and is supposed to be fairly fast. > > +Author: Jeroen van der Zijp > WWW: http://www.fox-toolkit.org/fox.html This is wrong and bogus; we've been removing those lines earlier, why put it back? Please review Kato's PRs more thoroughly if you want to handle them, thank you.