From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 31 21:37:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8263616A418 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B060C13C45D for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0VLYEAw003951; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:34:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0VLY574003944; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:34:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:34:05 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Erik Trulsson In-Reply-To: <20080131200358.GA20462@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20080131223340.B3880@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080131194240.G3450@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <53500ACAFC7943DF8147D23894EDE42F@Europa> <20080131200358.GA20462@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:37:32 -0000 > That is usually what happens when the disk controller is one that FreeBSD > does not have support for, so it treats the controller as a "Generic" ATA > controller. Should normally work fine albeit with somewhat suboptimal > performance. (And even though it says UDMA33 a SATA controller should still > work at SATA150 speed, so the performance penalty should not be so severe.) > in my case it was slow and unstable, up to 15 minutes between crashes.