From owner-freebsd-alpha Sat Jan 5 8:59:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620CB37B417 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 08:59:23 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g05GxLg93675; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:59:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20.cicely.de [10.1.1.22]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g05GpBtx071687; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:51:11 +0100 (CET)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de) Received: from cicely8.cicely.de (cicely8.cicely.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g05GpAW17887; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:51:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely8.cicely.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g05Gp9O15314; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:51:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 17:51:08 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: "Floris 'Tamama' van Gog" Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What could be wrong? very slow networking box Message-ID: <20020105175108.A15190@cicely8.cicely.de> References: <004401c195fe$18378c90$9600000a@tamama> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <004401c195fe$18378c90$9600000a@tamama> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely8.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 04:31:49PM +0100, Floris 'Tamama' van Gog wrote: > Holas, > > I think this is not right > > bloodscent# ping localhost > PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.056 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.700 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.629 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.678 ms > ^C > --- localhost ping statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.629/0.766/1.056/0.170 ms > bloodscent# > > I can remember local loopbacks to be a 'tad' faster (0.008ms or > something like that) 8µS are only 1328 clock cycles on your 166MHz System. Memory bandwidth is much slower - hard to beleave. Maybe you had run Linux - AFAIK Linux ping show seconds... > Someone in #freebsd/undernet said it might be a hardware conflict > somehow. > > The machine is an AXPCI33 166Mhz with 64MB ram (well its in the dmesg > below). When I had natd and pptpclient going to get internet > connectivity for my LAN the connection got so slow that it was > noticable. A game, mostly udp data, 7.5kb/sec made the uptime stats go > to 1.54 1.30 1.20 (the gateway was only routing) This is on a PC164, which is much faster than an AXPpci33: ticso@cicely9> ping 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.144 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.085 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms ^C --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.085/0.103/0.144/0.024 ms > If anyone has any ideas what this might be or cause it, I would love to > hear it! I'm not shure what you expect, but we are talking about less than a millisecond. My AXPpci33 machine is not up so I can't compare. But my other machines (NetBSD/Solaris) are in a similar range. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message