From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 23 00:15:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136E2E84 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schmiedgen@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4196231D for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pepe.smoke.local ([88.74.235.131]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPlY2-1Vcbqr2jcw-0053pc for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:15:15 +0200 Message-ID: <52671512.7000406@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 02:15:14 +0200 From: Michael Schmiedgen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is freebsd-update braindamaged, or I'm using it wrong? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:I8bQjNUYqEPOxkLE/WZ5FA8GwE+kgUJImgrJWR8x7frzpmmL62o GFiQFn2OiSw9WmZLkJytbOHaOERUjFakkFodElIzPtZ8BkEtvcjHoA+o4QZI5rjB7iZcGZa KutumjCRtNOTAGkiuO8JqyyW9WuGt8UaPkCVqkXGwzIwFT+l4e0ofHF2oLEK/1i8rLCkfRi exJSD3DFhbR7p3ES6hVyA== X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:15:18 -0000 On 10/01/13 11:16, Ivan Voras wrote: > This is the first time I've used freebsd-update in years, and I'm > immediately flagging it as something I won't use in the future. For > the last half hour it has been forcing me to manually resolve, one by > one, in an editor, hundreds of "merge conflicts" such as these: > > 1 <<<<<<< current version > 2 # $FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/etc/gettytab 209954 2010-07-12 19:09:18Z bcr $ > 3 ======= > 4 # $FreeBSD: release/9.2.0/etc/gettytab 243623 2012-11-27 19:23:54Z peterj $ > 5 >>>>>>> 9.2-RELEASE > 6 # from: @(#)gettytab 5.14 (Berkeley) 3/27/91 > 7 # Another thing was that I had to invoke pwd_mkdb manually after password file was merged. I wondered, because behaviour in mergemaster is to recognize this. Michael