From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Dec 13 6:36:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388FC14F16 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 06:36:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id HAA28120; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 07:26:26 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 07:26:26 -0700 (MST) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199912131426.HAA28120@narnia.plutotech.com> To: dg@root.com Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Again: CRD-Raid-Controller and FreeBSD 3.x X-Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.scsi In-Reply-To: <199912131033.CAA06144@implode.root.com> User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980818 ("Laura") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <199912131033.CAA06144@implode.root.com> you wrote: >> >>Perhaps. Better fixed firmware than terrible performance. > > I've been reading all of this and I'm still wondering what this is all > about. TeraSolutions has many of the CRD-5440-104 (LVD version) controllers > in the field and have never had problems with them. Have you deployed a configuration with two systems attached to the same array? This is not the first time that I've heard of CRD problems with multi-host access. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message