From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 29 19: 6:32 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from canonware.com (canonware.com [207.20.242.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B7AF15700 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:06:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jasone@canonware.com) Received: (qmail 92662 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Jan 2000 03:03:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:03:24 -0800 From: Jason Evans To: "Russell L. Carter" Cc: Jason Evans , cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r/uthread uthread_accept.c uthread_aio_suspend.c uthread_bind.c uthread_connect.c uthread_dup.c uthread_dup2.c uthread_execve.c uthread_exit.c uthread_fchflags.c uthread_fchmod.c uthread_fchown.c uthread_flock.c uthread_fork.c ... Message-ID: <20000129190324.E73462@sturm.canonware.com> References: <20000130030156.F119577@pinyon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000130030156.F119577@pinyon.org>; from rcarter@pinyon.org on Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 08:01:56PM -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 08:01:56PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Does this need an UPDATING entry? I don't care at all about doing > make world twice, but I wouldn't do it unless I knew it was > required. I don't think it's deserving of an UPDATING entry. This is actually a bootstrapping issue for the build system, from what I can tell. In this case, we're lucky that it merely breaks libc_r, rather than breaking the build. Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message