From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 18:08:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56A816A4F6; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:08:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C1243D31; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9LI8Am6036601; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:08:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9LI89UD036600; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:08:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:08:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20041021180809.GA36479@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <4175B591.4090407@elischer.org> <20041020190502.GA33840@dragon.nuxi.com> <200410201553.40823.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410201553.40823.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Daniel Eischen cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Julian Elischer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/net htonl.S ntohl.S X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:08:12 -0000 On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 03:53:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > We've hashed this out in the ancient past before and decided that we > would require a custom kernel for 80386 for 5.x but not a custom > userland. >From my memory that's not what we hashed out. We spoke of not supporting (ie, running on) 80386 by default. There was no explicit talk of just the kernel and not userland. Do you have mail logs showing otherwise? I'm guessing this will have to go to RE@ and Core@ to reconfirm the policy. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)