From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 20 17:25:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A49E106564A for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@redwerk.com) Received: from redwerk.com (redwerk.com [89.105.196.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285848FC08 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:25:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@redwerk.com) Received: from 70-234-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net ([91.124.234.70] helo=jdevelop.priv) by redwerk.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LvxFK-0004Qy-Tv for freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:25:35 +0200 Received: from bofh by jdevelop.priv with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LvxFJ-0006zw-74 for freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:25:29 +0300 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:25:28 +0300 From: Eugeny N Dzhurinsky To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090420172528.GA18846@jdevelop.priv> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org References: <49EA1485.7000001@videotron.ca> <20090419170309.GA21399@jdevelop.priv> <20090420.075451.29593248145856573.ken@tydfam.jp> <20090420062739.GA92354@jdevelop.priv> <49EC76DD.1030809@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49EC76DD.1030809@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.4.2 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:25:37 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:21:33AM -0400, Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:54:51AM +0900, ken wrote: > >> Strange,,,, > >> I could gpatch the most recent port/java/eclipse with given diff wit= hout any problem. And I am using new eclipse to see if it is OK or not. > >> > >> It may worth to update ports/java/eclipse and apply the patch. > >=20 > > I did that but with no luck :( > >=20 >=20 > Hi Eugeny, >=20 > Could you try to revert your eclipse directory to a clean state (using cs= up or cvs depending on how you get your ports) and then > re-apply the patch with the following: >=20 > (cd /usr/ports/java/eclipse; gpatch -p0 < /path/to/patchfile) >=20 > If your eclipse ports tree is clean this should work without generating a= ny error. And in fact that works fine. Very strange, I assumed the -d switch does its work... Anyway, sorry for disturbing you, hopefully the new port will build and install w/o problems :) Thank you for the help and patience! --=20 Eugene N Dzhurinsky --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAknssAgACgkQy/i/DoZLbHwRnACcDtQFhid9RH65CKGg5x6gdp6e ifcAoIW5xFqHoX1yK7W2RltFFDavVnRb =4Otn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--