From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 4 11:10:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF9316A402 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 11:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7845413C448 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 11:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 May 2007 11:10:36 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 04 May 2007 13:10:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/0fcUHexX0ye71/Jc8v1jAT4Rc+tGc4G8ZSkzGDm bsBPwXIG9Vec9K Message-ID: <463B1499.40102@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 13:10:17 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olaf Greve References: <2BEB30C2-C9C5-43AB-9DCA-5C9A1B0AC2C0@axis.nl> <8DDF332E-A03A-44DC-A87B-D64EC6B91E5A@axis.nl> <1896C639-2518-484B-8CD1-5936811AB093@axis.nl> In-Reply-To: <1896C639-2518-484B-8CD1-5936811AB093@axis.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: How to make Apache (2.2.4) less greedy, or Sendmail less polite? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:10:39 -0000 Olaf Greve wrote: > PS: This morning (and some of the other past few days as well) I took a > closer look to the server loads, and it looks like during the better > part of the morning the load is virtually 0%, and around midday (or > slighlty before?), all of a sudden Apache starts going crazy and > receives very heavy load. I wonder if this can perhaps be some DOS > attack, and hence I'd like to see what each of the stressed daemon > instances is doing exactly... It might as well be a search engine spider.