From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 14:48:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA04106564A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35178FC08 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so521004yxl.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:48:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bb0JvzzM84059qLjF+s+H1uoY/IAAMA2RKwFw3iwmR0=; b=KDneGT2mjX8ibROGmghpFlQ6VB+F6t0PfpVkdAGtWruZs4sb/Qi24viDhSPGPtYcYm fCrKsTQmnUTVU2RgdEHqv6tKhlq4VGBGegc2v6h4e3IOhCB2ZQ23bsP2xkr6xpniYdPP Ob9znl6PLO9satT1nvc1o58V2pFvT/XBXQUcY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZrFcxLUMhOyXulOOwk1wNQHUqnRvobT2SwNJK0BzCdbgPUn7Eb2CLq1ZFrhO/DPnRk l6Uyr2KVkOrf+r8i1aoEWN1042PAfvlNWtfbmfJsD7RaV2G9/7EmFQiV8A27q3/uDczi Z2cZ9tlb/uprlbaXItvQbY5dTNmT1G41tBVqM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.116.141 with SMTP id m13mr6439285bkq.187.1288795724300; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.71.138 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:48:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101103145354.0cbd8ae0@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <20101103105838.GA70884@icarus.home.lan> <20101103145354.0cbd8ae0@ernst.jennejohn.org> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regarding kern/148655 fix for 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:48:46 -0000 >> I'm not sure how much traction you'll get with that statement, but for >> what it's worth, I agree. =A0The severity of the situation in the PR is >> extremely high, and the repercussions if experienced are bad. =A0This *i= s* >> something that should be backported to the RELENG_8_1 branch. >> > > Considering that 8.2 is a ways off I also tend to agree. > > But that sort of in-your-face demand for action won't make any friends > among the committers, you can bet on that. I am not entirely sure why my question was understood as some kind of aggression, that was certainly not my intention. > When is the fix getting backported from -STABLE to 8.1 as an errata fix? I think this a normal, valid question? > A lot of people cannot and will not update to 8.1 before this is fixed This is a simple fact. > and no, "just track -STABLE" is not a valid answer Just pre-empting the usual expected "just update to -STABLE to get your fix" responces. This is not a valid solution for a lot of users out there. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov