From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 15 19:49:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2413B16A417 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F12343D8D for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:49:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p77so1613177nfc for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.160.2 with SMTP id i2mr6807138hue; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2sm1097189huc.2006.10.15.12.49.16; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B92B8DE; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:49:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss.seibercom.net [192.168.0.4]) (Authenticated sender: gerard@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED19B82E; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:49:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:49:29 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom.NET In-Reply-To: <45328A41.9040904@locolomo.org> References: <45328A41.9040904@locolomo.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20061015154213.35EC.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.27 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Non English Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:49:24 -0000 On Sunday October 15, 2006 at 03:21:37 (PM) Erik Norgaard wrote: > Ian Smith wrote: [...] > Maybe I didn't make clear how the filtering in Postfix works? Each > header line is unwrapped and then filtered independent of the others. > There is no info as to if that is the first or last Received line. > > I can make a rule to reject the mail. And I can make a rule that accept > a given header line, but the remaining header will still be filtered and > possibly rejected. > > I can't make a header check for Received cause checks for content-type > to be skipped. > > Nor can I make incoming mail from white listed servers skip the header > checks. The two things are independent: The first applies when > establishing the connection: HELO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO etc. The header > checks are invoked if the initial delivery request was accepted. > > Yes, that sucks, but that's how Postfix works. Are you sure about that? I use Postfix myself and that does not appear to be correct, although it might be. Have you ever posted this question on the postfix forum? There are some pretty sharp individuals there who might be able to give you some advice. [...] -- Gerard "An optimist thinks that this is the best possible world. A pessimist fears that this is true." Anonymous