From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 10:55:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2D737B401 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 10:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux.research.att.com (H-135-207-24-16.research.att.com [135.207.24.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907E943FAF for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 10:55:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from unixmail.research.att.com (unixmail.research.att.com [135.207.26.71])h4SHvLEI031720; Wed, 28 May 2003 13:57:21 -0400 Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])h4SHsFXs021875; Wed, 28 May 2003 13:54:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fenner Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.5) id h4SHtbu05504; Wed, 28 May 2003 10:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200305281755.h4SHtbu05504@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: is@rambler-co.ru Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 10:55:37 -0700 Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendfile(2) SF_NOPUSH flag proposal X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:55:53 -0000 Why not set PRUS_MORETOCOME on all but the final pru_send() call? Bill