From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 05:43:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B2816A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF0943D48 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 05:43:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum1c-102.pit.adelphia.net [24.53.179.102]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3800769A71; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:43:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 08:43:41 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Perica Veljanovski Message-Id: <20040604084341.1f501f0f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040604132326.E8FE.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> References: <20040604132326.E8FE.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help me make a Mail Server choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:43:56 -0000 Perica Veljanovski wrote: > Hi again > > It turned out to be a public mail server as well! The choice for the MTA > on fell on postfix :) Now I have to chose POP/IMAP and Virus/Spam. > > I would appreciate if you can give me some input on your experience with > Cyrus or Courier, since they are my choices for pop/imap. Also I'd like > some suggestions on what to use for virus/spam protection, and how they > are implemented in postfix? In addition to whatever else you do, use a greylister to prevent virus/spam. I've been playing with different techniques for months, and the greylister is the best I've used so far. It never has a false positive, rejects virus/spam before using up all the bandwidth to send it, uses almost no CPU and (in my experience) stops about 95% of the viruses and spams. http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/ -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com