From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 15:30:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A68116A4B3 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA04E43FBF for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8GMUOUp022173 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8GMUOFC022169; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200309162230.h8GMUOFC022169@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: "Simon L. Nielsen" Subject: Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Simon L. Nielsen" List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:30:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/56902; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Josef El-Rayes Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:22:06 +0200 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.09.16 23:14:53 +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote: > > I don't think X11 should be marked up as application, since it is not > > really an application, but rather the protocol/framework. Have you > > found any other places where it's marked up with the application tag? >=20 > for me it was in this association talking about X11 as an association, > but i looked at the handbook chapter about X and only XFree86 was marked > up as application so you are right here. >=20 > shall i redo this patch and pr 56903 to leave X11 with markup? I think that would be preferable. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Z40Mh9pcDSc1mlERAifQAJ9zwnCLlTctbBaBeZuzt3kehF/+vACeKsKW L4yP7JMql9JSdl/t2QBGSy0= =2YVu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--