From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 11 13: 6:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C46837B502 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06911; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:01:14 GMT (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001011160606.02538a90@mail.etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:10:03 -0400 To: Andreas Brodmann , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG From: Dennis Subject: Re: etherchannel / bonding In-Reply-To: <39E18110.DF77552A@gmaare.migros.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 04:25 AM 10/09/2000, Andreas Brodmann wrote: >Hello all, > >does anyone know if the etherchannel >(aka bonding) is a feature that's expected >to be seen in future releases of freebsd? > >Andreas We will have the feature in our bandwidth manager product for FreeBSD shortly, including fallover. Its really load balancing; bonding is a bad term (no doubt coined by the linux camp). dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message