Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 08:58:30 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: davem@caip.rutgers.edu (David S. Miller) Cc: terry@lambert.org, deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au Subject: Re: GNAT-pthreads integration bugs/questions Message-ID: <199705191558.IAA24208@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199705190257.WAA16061@darkwing.rutgers.edu> from "David S. Miller" at May 18, 97 10:57:25 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Put it at the bottom on the threads stack... > > There is no threads stack in an rfork. > > A thread lacks a stack with rfork(), is this what you are > saying? How in the world does this work? Heh. "man rfork". The rfork call produces processes with shared address spaces, not threads. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705191558.IAA24208>