Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:46:51 +0930
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
Cc:        Matt Behrens <matt@megaweapon.zigg.com>, Mike Burgett <mburgett@awen.com>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: [Q] 2.2.5 bind release 
Message-ID:  <199709260716.QAA00314@word.smith.net.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Sep 1997 23:19:11 MST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970925231651.14946B-100000@shell.uniserve.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'm 99.9% sure it'll be 4.9.6.  8.1.1 has the strongest nameserver but its
> > resolver library is sorely lacking and would probably cause many packages
> > to break.
> 
>   Has FreeBSD ever use the BIND resolver library?  It seems to me that the
> FreeBSD resolver is whole mix of different things, and is not 4.9.6
> either.

What sort of dopey question is this?  Have a look at src/contrib/bind
and decide for yourself what FreeBSD uses.

>   Besides the BIND resolver is mainly for systems that come with such a
> useless/broken resolver that anything is better (ex SunOS 4.1).

Not by half.

mike





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709260716.QAA00314>