From owner-freebsd-multimedia Thu Jul 10 09:55:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA11684 for multimedia-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 09:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA11675 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 09:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA01497; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 09:54:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707101654.JAA01497@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: Randall Hopper cc: Luigi Rizzo , freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vat on sb16? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Jul 1997 06:41:05 EDT." <19970710064105.47517@ct.picker.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 09:54:16 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of Randall Hopper : > are currently locked into MS Windoze for this; if I were them, I'd sure be > looking for a way out :-) So, an opportunity to win over more users. > > It'd be a nice feature for the existing user base too, if it isn't > technically impractical. > Hi, Basically, we need someone or a couple of hackers to tackle the problem. My story line with the SB thingies , I dont like them;nevertheless, if someone or several individuals takes charge of supporting the SB cards thats fine with me. Last but not least I expect many more experts on SB cards than on lets say the GUS,.i.e., if I suspect that the technology is main stream and that there are others which can provide the support I won't do it. Cheers, Amancio