From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 15:38:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1427F37B408 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B403443FD7 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:38:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5E766B9B; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 641A0B26; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:38:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Anurag Chaudhary Message-ID: <20030605223818.GA44652@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lockmgr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 22:38:23 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:26:32PM +0530, Anurag Chaudhary wrote: > is lockmgr interface safer than mutexes. Define "safer". They are certainly different. Kris --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+38ZZWry0BWjoQKURAnLMAKCRF8gQDWmkCJGB24/YbEl8TAmOZQCgppS3 4AykBYorjq9QokresGmynxU= =HzYB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--