Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:44:39 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: geom_part_mbr vs user Message-ID: <4CD104D7.7000208@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4CD04425.4020204@icyb.net.ua> References: <4CD04425.4020204@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 02.11.2010 20:02, Andriy Gapon wrote: > But I still believe that geom_part_mbr "thinking" that it is smarter than me is > incorrect. Yeah, keep using CHS params for some defaults, etc, but do obey what I > explicitly specify if doesn't violate fundamental constraints like media size or > slice overlaps. I think it was done for maximum compatibility. Some utilities assume that partitions will be aligned on cylinder boundaries. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM0QTbAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF62hoIAMFAT2AohH8PKWQuSmrDUsxC PSs8oisTJqBfYZC3FZ/1Hu5oHk+VMOaY+Mk7hWOsoE3O5DsVVrGSKPnQVqD0aoQT YSn6x5Sw8dlSKNnoiEgFWu10V5LHxUSn6WsfTvxDJmq9KHipX11qadOSbn7CRFwa jnoj9tMYZU/Fgu5+8nDpHu62nQE3Q8/3E26hyIyHxVyvLY6jHprV3Jh1yGDP40Mh XSJYueYaOtfYlKJ/E+M6reldZ6Ug2yQchS09UGQ5LkMUbdqtgzjHtEVZYxQysqXT 6vBukHrzmr3KLmHv3BA5nThoUWQFZJujo4nPRZGuudFPUxZZ70MDHlwW3BD05M8= =MyoE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CD104D7.7000208>