From owner-freebsd-isp  Wed Jul 23 08:18:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA23715
          for isp-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 08:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA23704
          for <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 08:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dialup-usr11.etinc.com (dialup-usr11.etinc.com [204.141.95.132]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA17307; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970723110759.00cf8938@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 11:08:17 -0400
To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net>,
        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and NT 
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us>, isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 10:02 PM 7/22/97 -0700, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote:
>
>>> >I started asking around some of my 'NT' expert friends, and if you do
>>> >'development' on an NT box, it's *very* unstable.  Normal users can take
>[...]
>
>>> So what you're saying is I, and the thousands of people using NT for
>>> serious development, without crashing it, are imagining things?

Mine doesnt crash, it just gets real slow.

Many OSs and routers dont "crash" because they dont have panic
routines.....UNIX crashes way too often because, unfortunately, panics
are the way it handles adversity. Other OSs just get screwed up when
a kernel failure occurs.

db