From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 27 13:58:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5578F37B401 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from gicco.homeip.net (dclient80-218-75-162.hispeed.ch [80.218.75.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D47D43F5F for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:58:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from localhost.here (idefix@gicco.homeip.net [127.0.0.1]) by gicco.homeip.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0RLwR9c002962 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:58:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from idefix@localhost) by localhost.here (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0RLwQW2002961 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:58:26 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.here: idefix set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:58:26 +0100 From: Hanspeter Roth To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw2 vs ipfilter Message-ID: <20030127215826.GA2926@gicco.homeip.net> Reply-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030127143019.069e3380@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030127143019.069e3380@marble.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Jan 27 at 15:56, Mike Tancsa spoke: > > Hello all, > I am looking for information to help me decide which will offer the best > performance on a FreeBSD firewall with a LOT of interfaces (50+ vlan ints). You might also consider OpenBSD's pf. -Hanspeter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message