From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 8 15:06:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2FB16A47B for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 15:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFA343D45 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 15:06:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 45D0CAA; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:05:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on filt2.ece.cmu.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=3.1.4 Received: from [10.9.204.128] (dsl093-061-215.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.61.215]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6F8A6 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:05:58 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <200610081454.k98Eseas063823@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200610081454.k98Eseas063823@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7B127A4F-6756-4FAC-BFD8-6C5096B4FB0A@ece.cmu.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:05:55 -0400 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Re: scp -c none (was Re: NFS client slow on amd64 6.2-PRERELEASE #2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 15:06:04 -0000 On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:54 , Oliver Fromme wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> [...] >> It's really too bad the OpenBSD guys refuse to >> incorporate the HP (high-performance) patches into OpenSSH, and >> being able to say "-c none" would *really* help when it comes to >> benchmarking network I/O via scp > > I considered submitting the patch for official inclusion, > but the OpenSSH people would reject it because they call > it "insecure", and the FreeBSD people would reject it > because they say the patch should be submitted to the > OpenSSH people. *sigh* :-( Actually, the openssh-portable folks are keeping an eye on the hpn patches, but those are still evolving so PSC isn't willing to submit them for inclusion. Try searching the openssh list for discussion about it. (No, I imagine they wouldn't be imported into the OpenBSD version, but then, neither is PAM support. I'm not sure we care what they think, given that FreeBSD's openssh supports PAM.) -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH