From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 02:18:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32101C55; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 02:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0505A1E; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 02:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757DC28428; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 03:18:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-89-177-50-74.net.upcbroadband.cz [89.177.50.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93D2D28427; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 03:18:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54FFA623.4020308@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 03:19:15 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis Subject: Re: There has to be a better way of merging /etc during a major freebsd-update References: <201503110105.t2B155sY086709@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201503110105.t2B155sY086709@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, list-freebsd-stable@jyborn.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 02:18:59 -0000 Don Lewis wrote on 03/11/2015 02:05: > On 10 Mar, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >> This and some other problems with freebsd-update (hanging on the reboot >> after update) turns me back to using source compiled upgrades. >> I am compiling 10.1 right now to do the upgrades from 8.4 to 10.1 on 15 >> machines. > > I only do source upgrades, but I've still run into the hang on reboot > problem with 10.1-STABLE. The problem seems to have gone away when I > switched the root filesystem (there's actually only one filesystem on > that machine) from SU+J to SU. It is a strange. I am not using SU+J on any machine, but some machines did hang on reboot after freebsd-update even on an older releases like 8.x or 9.x. Upgraded from 9.1 an 9.2 to 10.1 from sources and rebooted without problem. Miroslav Lachman