From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 07:35:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F96B16A4CE; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 07:35:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from charentes.fr.clara.net (charentes.fr.clara.net [212.43.194.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0335243D2F; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 07:35:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ogautherot@freesurf.fr) Received: from mail.freesurf.fr (mail.freesurf.fr [212.43.206.50]) by charentes.fr.clara.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D458D592B4; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:35:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.freesurf.fr (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 809DAE4A06; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:35:51 +0100 (CET) References: <20040118160910.9431.qmail@web12602.mail.yahoo.com> <200401192049.12135.anubis357@optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200401192049.12135.anubis357@optusnet.com.au> From: ogautherot@freesurf.fr To: anubis Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:35:51 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Sender: ogautherot@freesurf.fr Message-Id: <20040119153551.809DAE4A06@mail.freesurf.fr> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 05:22:50 -0800 cc: sam Long cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Real Time FreeBSD?!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:35:55 -0000 Hi Anubis and Den! Anubis, I've "translated" the questions into what I understood. Den, do not hesitate to complain if I had it wrong. I would guess the original message was: - what is the roadmap of FreeBSD (new features)? - (I let this one to authorized people :-) ) - How can a real-time system be designed around FreeBSD? - I've seen many people that knew what a real-time system is but they had different views... It all depends on the type of application and the allowed reaction time, in the end. What do you want to do? If the POSIX extensions are OK, then go for it. FreeBSD is a nice system! - FreeBSD has a small kernel due to module support but how stable is this kernel? - let's say it's stable enough to serve as a secure Internet backbone and file server (that must say pretty much...) - What are the current issues? - See the release notes. anubis écrit: > Dude, could you rephrase that? > Its a bit hard to understand > > On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 04:09 pm, sam Long wrote: > > I have a system FreeBSD 5.1-p11. > > How will develop further FreeBSD? > > How real time is possible to make from FreeBSD > > operational system? > > I know, that in FreeBSD there are expansions real time > > of standard POSIX. > > > > I have a small kernel of system due to modules, but on > > how many stably such > > kernel? > > What problems can be?I have born all modules for > > limits of a kernel. > > > > Thank you for the help Den. > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes > > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"