From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 12 9:55:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF6237B400 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158643E3B for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:55:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CGtvw48313 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:55:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200209121655.g8CGtvw48313@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Time related Signal to Use in a Daemon Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:55:57 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Many thanks. Fernando Gleiser writes: >yes. man alarm(2) or setitimer(2) That is good. I didn't know in this case if I was headed down the wrong path or not. You saved me a lot of time. Martin McCormick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message