From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jun  5 14:50:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA09169
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 14:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.uniserve.com (tom@shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA09161
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 14:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tom@localhost)
	by shell.uniserve.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA12940;
	Thu, 5 Jun 1997 14:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell.uniserve.com: tom owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 14:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, James FitzGibbon <james@nexis.net>
Subject: Re: Use of your strptime(3) code (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <19970605225520.HQ28541@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970605144649.11498A-100000@shell.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, J Wunsch wrote:

> As James FitzGibbon wrote:
> 
> > Because in 2.0b6, the author removed the requirement for a system
> > strptime(3) call.  Still, this situtation may come up again, so I offered
> > it as something to add to libc/libcompat.
> 
> Again, with the existing copyright, it's simply unacceptable.  I'm
> saying this for at least the third time now, but didn't get any
> response so far.

  Also, I don't think we need it.  None of the hundreds of other ports
need it, and as it seems neither does msql.

Tom