From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Dec  7 13:55: 5 2000
From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  7 13:55:03 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (tserver.conference.usenix.org [209.179.127.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A75F37B400
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  7 Dec 2000 13:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beastie.mckusick.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA04017;
	Thu, 7 Dec 2000 13:54:43 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com)
Message-Id: <200012072154.NAA04017@beastie.mckusick.com>
To: janb@cs.utep.edu
Subject: Re: Getting Kernel Process Information 
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 14:46:32 MST."
             <Pine.GSO.4.30.0012071445580.12857-100000@gecko> 
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 13:54:43 -0800
From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

	From: janb@cs.utep.edu
	Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:46:32 -0700 (MST)
	To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
	cc: <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
	Subject: Re: Getting Kernel Process Information
	In-Reply-To: <200012071938.LAA03622@beastie.mckusick.com>

	> to user processes. I recognize that there are better ways
	> to handle these issues. I am just trying to make an

	What are some of the better ways of handling the issue?

	JAn

See Terry Lambert's commentary on the exporting of the ucred
structure that appeared about a week ago on this list for a
good overview of the alternatives.

	Kirk McKusick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message