From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 18:44:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4A537B401; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from espresso.bsdmike.org (espresso.bsdmike.org [65.39.129.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C8143F75; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:44:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@espresso.bsdmike.org) Received: by espresso.bsdmike.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B85C99C4C; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 21:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 21:30:44 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft To: Andy Farkas Message-ID: <20030409213044.I16782@espresso.bsdmike.org> References: <200304090304.h3934Csu028105@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030410111953.N72779-100000@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410111953.N72779-100000@hewey.af.speednet.com.au>; from andyf@speednet.com.au on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:27:08AM +1000 Organization: The FreeBSD Project cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: your mail X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 01:44:58 -0000 Andy Farkas writes: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > Log: > > o Add jls(8) for listing active jails. > > o Add jexec(8) to execute a command in an existing jail. > > o Add -j option for killall(1) to kill all processes in a specified > > jail. > > o Add -i option to jail(8) to output jail ID of newly created jail. > > > > What is the reasoning behind adding another utility (jls) rather than > incorporating its function into jail(8)? > > ie. perhaps `jail -l' could list jails. Same reason ipcs(1) and ipcrm(1) are separate utilities. Each utility should do one thing well. But if others want to see these utilities combined, I'm willing to reconsider. Best regards, Mike Barcroft