From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Sep 30 12:06:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA14206
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper.itribe.net (gatekeeper.itribe.net [209.49.144.254])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA14184
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 12:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709301906.PAA29715@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
Received: forwarded by SMTP 1.5.2.
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 15:09:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>
To: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Microsoft brainrot (was: r-cmds and DNS and /etc/host.conf) 
In-Reply-To: <199709301309.WAA00520@word.smith.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Mike Smith wrote:

> > 
> > I'd much rather send my root password (over SSL) - that way, I can at
> > least use S/Key.
> 
> What's the smallest available secure HTTP server you know of?  Anyone?
> 
> > However, if we're going to use Java anyway, there are lots of crypto
> > we could use - but will this be the easiest way of implementing the
> > interface?
> 
> IMHO Java may be a lose, unless we can come up with a 'legacy' 
> interface for the terminal addicts and people with non-Java browsers.
> 
> mike
> 
> 

If you can support lynx, you can support anything.  I would make that the
LCD mark.  Lynx is apparently gaining nice features while retaining its
X independence.

Jamie Bowden
System Administrator, iTRiBE.net

Abusenet: The Misinformation Superhighway