From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 10 17:14:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FA1106564A; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF358FC15; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi7 with SMTP id 7so78418pxi.13 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:14:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KR/LZ50hgWXMilUVBbRMsJBaZenEW31+K11kJ1r+Kw0=; b=k0xX1dgzFtULP9xAk7v9fQdRzAd9Bqo/qYKK7Z+bhLSm0aGhCLLi3Dr4Hawq6P9bXG LlaV658ECRRsocKIJNudsUtWihZ/NfGCeqcxMUrhqJdncKqbUV08uY3RvzJnlK7FbeR4 BQPy0CQ7rvmvJGTBwrGFVRI5tfEtszVVRoCug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZpGW9QWYodO94UuRAiJifqJ7rLP8NHH5wSwvhsW5zrYPtXbHb9L0OLDwIywo+MkZBY liTgm+nJtgZRqlQQXp6q26zgKZq8JSR+L9hA29mYmXc4Y9in67EMoycG7LeOAzJGDRPO 1XcWZwrqG+a0xIp8br5fqx9SHI0Ivb2JSK2Ag= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.101.14 with SMTP id d14mr374658wam.176.1276190048645; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.73.20 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:14:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:14:08 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alexander Sack To: Jack Vogel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Juli Mallett , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual-rate transceivers with ixgbe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:14:09 -0000 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > Well, em doesn't have a pluggable phy :) Hardware is different, that's why > there's > a different driver.... Thanks Juli/Jack. I didn't know that! And knowing is half the battle... So, not to completely hijack Juli's thread (sorry), but what about these SFP issues. What was the point of the code I mentioned? Am I living that dangerously commenting it out? What's the real fix here? -aps