From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 06:50:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1496D16A420 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A3043D45 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:50:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9P6oFYJ071286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:50:15 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9P6oEJx071285; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:50:14 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:50:14 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Mao Shou Yan Message-ID: <20051025065014.GY41520@cell.sick.ru> References: <31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C355218284807@bjngsmail01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C355218284807@bjngsmail01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: em(4) patch for test X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:50:19 -0000 On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:41:28AM +0800, Mao Shou Yan wrote: M> Can we patch it against 4.11? M> If not, can we patch the em_intr() to 4.11? M> Is this patch useful to 4.11? I don't think so. Do you encounter a lot if input errors on 4.11? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE