From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 14:00:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C8D1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent.thoumie@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFD08FC16 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent.thoumie@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3390340waf.3 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:00:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=4/Bj+mGvVxT2sTAITugOOKQNIj0r5xAwt4nrLcXxpds=; b=gimpq6bS4K14dIEceiR2mZl/FHuA6iK/HR8SXeYqWA2Yol+JOnX7mQpIcJgrkBnnfwCiMOa7fq7Bq2xWw21DpJfmDpDKzkulsb1CuZu9JzKLXjDqIpYtUzprap1q9DR8HM2P9tBl1bqo+gVL5bbLvYNfcNJM3NyHG9AJ0YfWwv4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=YIMWReUH59oHS3TItq16h2hfiIrYfERcD3Nt4uIj6Ek3N0zZPTtPvJfFQ+Y/xkRTIJMg3NFzBp+sauQeCWfKn9OnlggsKfJEqx/TJxiHfRPTka94zJgotBpjP6CIuHsKo5N2daHCKrhTcxrXfiqfTX1jJt/VCwdeX6KYcGeTEko= Received: by 10.114.169.2 with SMTP id r2mr8421690wae.76.1205330415294; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.15 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:00:15 +0000 From: "Florent Thoumie" Sender: florent.thoumie@gmail.com To: "Benjamin Lutz" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200803121311.51383.mail@maxlor.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2d95a00fe849ddbe Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/113132 (make -j patch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:00:16 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Florent Thoumie wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Lutz wrote: > > This patch has been sitting in GNATS for a couple of months now: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113132 > > > > I've received a few mails from people reporting success, and none > > reporting that bad things have happened. Is it possible to get this > > committed? > > It needs to go through an experimental build first. > > IMHO, this is an ugly hack. Ultimately, we're talking about marking > almost 20k ports as parallel-safe. > > Why not taking the opposite approach? Allow it by default, figure out > which ports break and why, fix where possible? After talking with Pav, it seems it's still the best option as the breakage rate is quite high. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer