From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 21 15:46:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B01837B401 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gta.com (mailgate.gta.com [199.120.225.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C5B443FA3 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:46:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lab@gta.com) Received: (qmail 39456 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Jul 2003 22:46:36 -0000 Date: 21 Jul 2003 22:46:36 -0000 Message-ID: <20030721224636.39455.qmail@gta.com> From: Larry Baird To: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030721175214.16861.qmail@gta.com> User-Agent: tin/1.5.9-20010723 ("Chord of Souls") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.5-RELEASE-p3 (i386)) Subject: Re: differences in USB support between FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:46:38 -0000 > 5.x seems to have much better support for USB 2.0 as well. I have > a SanDisk 2.0 USB compact flash reader that just works with 5.1 release. > So far no amount of kernel hacking has made it work with 4.8. > Unfortunetly for me I need it to work under 4.8. )-: As a follow up to this problem report. The problem turned out to be the USB hub I was using on my 4.8 box. I would have sworn I tested without the hub last week when I first had problems. But alas I must have dreamed I made this test. All is well under 5.1 and 4.8 with my SanDisk USB 2.0 compact flash reader. (-: Larry -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Larry Baird | http://www.gta.com Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL Email: lab@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080