From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 09:40:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D279A16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:40:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.SNVACAID.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CD343FCB for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:40:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Received: from acm.org ([66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKHdukX029668; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:39:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Message-ID: <3FBCFC6C.3090107@acm.org> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:39:56 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031006 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stijn Hoop References: <62981.24.0.61.35.1069202574.squirrel@mail.yazzy.org> <200311190103.hAJ13Nlg000923@dyson.jdyson.com> <20031119015433.GN30485@roark.gnf.org> <3FBC2053.6040208@mindspring.com> <20031120022009.GB29530@dan.emsphone.com> <3FBC29EF.3030009@mindspring.com> <3FBC50DB.3000002@acm.org> <20031120072214.GH49554@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20031120072214.GH49554@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: richardcoleman@mindspring.com cc: masta@wifibsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: dyson@iquest.net cc: Dan Nelson cc: imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kientzle@acm.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:40:08 -0000 Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:27:55PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>Maybe it's time to separate these two functions? >>I would be content to have a static /sbin/sh >>that is used as the system script interpreter for >>rc scripts, etc. > > > And /usr/bin/sh as a user shell? I was thinking /bin/sh for the user shell and /sbin/sh for the system script interpreter. There must be a /bin/sh and given that there are many user scripts that rely on it, it seems that it must be a user shell. Tim Kientzle