From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 3 20:12:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA11763 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 20:12:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA11724 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 20:12:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA19324; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 20:12:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: "Kazuhiko KAWAKAMI" cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in mount_union In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 Jun 1998 03:50:30 +0900." <002001bd8f20$850896e0$0a01a8c0@camel.kazz-0.net> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 20:12:08 -0700 Message-ID: <19321.896929928@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I found a bug in mount_union of 2.2-stable. Yikes! Somebody trying to use unionfs in 2.2! ;-) Seriously, that's not the only panic you're going to get if you try to use that code in that branch. AFAIK, it's really only going to be a practical option for 3.0 unless someone back-ports all the changes which were necessary to make it truly work in -current. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message