From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 13:59:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB47E16A41B for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from smtp-3.dlr.de (smtp-3.dlr.de [195.37.61.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AF513C4F6 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:59:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.173.6]) by smtp-3.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:59:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:59:26 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: Timo Schoeler In-Reply-To: <20080111145128.abb76a0a.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> Message-ID: <20080111145557.C60251@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <47873B06.9010603@riscworks.net> <200801111058.m0BAwAMG001075@lurza.secnetix.de> <20080111140144.59498431.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <47876B39.3040703@FreeBSD.org> <20080111145128.abb76a0a.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: harti@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2008 13:59:26.0195 (UTC) FILETIME=[2D2FB430:01C8545A] Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Harti Brandt List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:59:29 -0000 On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Timo Schoeler wrote: TS>No, I didn't. I said that the work is done ineffectively as he's doing TS>underprioritized stuff. Working on higher prioritized stuff would be TS>more efficient, and would help the project even more. TS> TS>Given the assumption that the developer is able to do both, the Xmas TS>tree as well as importing ZFS v9 into the tree. TS> TS>(I don't see the point that when somebody is really *capable* of doing TS>both things, why should (s)he do the 'lower priority' thing. If you TS>are at the olympic stadium and you're the best sprinter, you wouldn't TS>join the marathon...!) Sorry, this is just crap. I'm a rather bad guitar player, at least much worse than I'm a programmer. Yet I enjoy playing Joe Pass at 1/4 the speed while I could import ZFS during that time ... People just bring to FreeBSD what they like to do, not what would be the best for you or others. If you want them to change priorities according to YOUR needs, pay them money. harti